Showing posts with label Microsoft. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Microsoft. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Sun to add Microsoft Windows to servers

This should benefit both of them in the long run . With a security deposit of pocketed $1.95 billion in their pockets, Sun shouldn't find this difficult

Sun Microsystems Inc. will begin building servers with onetime foe Microsoft Corp.’s Windows operating system installed directly in them, instead of forcing customers to install the ubiquitous software on their own or defect to a competitor for one-stop shopping.

The agreement announced Wednesday is the latest twist in a truce the companies, once bitter rivals, hammered out in 2004, when Sun pocketed $1.95 billion in a settlement payout from Microsoft over antitrust and patent allegations, and both companies vowed to make their products work better together.

Santa Clara, Calif.-based Sun will begin incorporating Microsoft’s Windows Server 2003 software into its so-called x64 servers, which are corporate computers that run on 64-bit microprocessors from Intel Corp. and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. Servers are the computers in corporate data centers that process large amounts of data such as Internet traffic or financial calculations.

Although Sun customers have been able to run Microsoft’s operating system on Sun servers for several years, Sun would not install it in the factory. That left customers who wanted Windows in the lurch unless they wanted to install it on their own or already had licensing contracts with Microsoft, in which case Sun would install it.

Redmond, Wash.-based Microsoft, the world’s largest software company, stands to gain from the agreement because of Sun’s reach in the server world. Sun is the world’s No. 3 server seller with 13% of the worldwide market, behind IBM Corp. and Hewlett-Packard Co., according to the latest data from market researcher IDC.

Monday, May 05, 2008

After Deal Dies, Yahoo Weighs Its Next Move

News Clip by MIGUEL HELFT

How low will Yahoo’s stock go on Monday? And how long will it stay there?

Some shareholders question the loyalties of Jerry Yang, left, who founded Yahoo with David Filo.

These questions are high in the minds of Yahoo shareholders, and probably its management, as the company considers its options after Microsoft’s decision to withdraw its offer to buy Yahoo for $33 a share, or approximately $47.5 billion.

For More details CLICK HERE

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

What Yahoo's board did wrong

Posted by Steve Tobak

I'm neither a Yahoo fan nor a Microsoft foe.

But I still mourn the loss of a unique business entity that, but for the lack of a few brave people, might have survived this ordeal. After all, survival is what life is all about, isn't it?

In my opinion, at a crucial moment in the company's history, Yahoo's board stuck its head in the sand and made believe things weren't as problematic as they were. If the members felt any concern or fear at all, they ignored it. Not only isn't that what boards are supposed to do, it isn't the brave thing to do, either.

For more details, please visit

http://www.cnet.com/8301-13555_1-9928578-34.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-5

PS...

This news-blog is written by Steve Tobak and it would just be considered sp*m if I put in my two bits now.

I have my reservations in the whole issue and shall write them out in a couple of weeks - until then I'm neither a Yahoo fan nor a Microsoft foe and neither is Fear an human emotion !

Monday, April 21, 2008

Wipro gets a duo to replace Paul

News Blog BANGALORE:

Wipro ended weeks of speculation by finally announcing it was appointing Suresh Vaswani and Girish Paranjpe as joint CEOs of the company’s $4.3-billion IT business. The company also appointed its CFO Suresh Senapaty along with Mr Vaswani and Mr Paranjpe to the board of Wipro Ltd. ET had first reported on 15th April that Wipro was planning a management rejig and would make important changes to its top tier of leadership.

'The timing is right. The previous structure was great in bringing us till here but we now need to think about what will take us forward. We are facing a US slowdown and we need to re-think how to grow the business,' Mr Paranjpe said in an exclusive chat with ET. 'Wipro is a large and complex business with many challenges and opportunities. We have to combine and strategise for the future,' added Mr Vaswani.

According to corporate VP, HR, Pratik Kumar, Wipro had been discussing these leadership changes for the last six months. He also said that there was nothing unusual in two people sharing the CEO’s position. 'We debated whether it would be one versus two. In Suresh and Girish we have two individuals who are very complementary in the way they work. We feel that two engines can pull faster than one,' said Mr Kumar. “We want to double the size of the IT business in 3 years and two people can do it much better” said Mr Paranjpe.

Wipro has not had a CEO and vice-chairman ever since Vivek Paul left the organisation in 2005. Mr Premji had hand-picked Mr Paul from GE to lead the IT business. Before that, the position belonged to Mr Arun Thiagarajan who was the MD and country manager of ABB prior to joining Wipro. This time Mr Premji has decided to choose the leaders from within the company.

After Mr Paul left Mr Premji assumed the CEO’s role, running the company with the help of independent business unit heads. Till last year he had 13 people reporting to him. With the new CEOs coming in the number of people reporting to Mr Premji will now go down to six. Apart from the two new CEOs, it includes Mr Kumar, Mr Senapaty, Wipro Consumer Care & Lighting president Vineet Agarwal and Wipro Infrastructure MD Anurag Behar. The new structure leaves Mr Premji free to focus on “employees, key customer engagements and investors”, says Kumar.

How the business and responsibility will be split between the two CEOs will be communicated to employees early next week, said the company. Among the many options being discussed is for one CEO to relocate to US. Kumar also said that the unusual decision to have two CEOs was not done to accommodate senior managers.

'It wasn’t decided from the interest of any individual but what was best for the business' he says adding that 'Too many engines can derail a train'. When asked why Mr Sudip Banerjee had moved out, Mr Kumar said, “Sudip could have happily continued in the structure, but he wanted a change. But he continues to be close to Mr Premji in his new role'.

From the first quarter of this financial year, Wipro will merge the operations of Wipro Technologies—its global services business—and Wipro Infotech—its India, M East and Asia Pacific business—into one business unit. Instead of looking at the business in terms of different geographies, henceforth there will be just one single IT business unit with two different revenue streams—global services and global products.

One reason is that India and emerging markets are now growing very fast and several Indian customers have now become as sophisticated as the rest of the world. Plus many of its global customers like Cisco and Microsoft now have big plans for India and emerging markets.

Bottomline :

If Paul was the highest paid Indian executive during that time, drawing around Rs 1.9 crore in salaries and Rs 4.9 crore in commission and incentives [apart from stock options for his colleagues ], Wipro must have save helluvalot during these 2 years

Besides, Azim Premji also proved that they don't need a top man at the helm. On the other hand, Paul had done a good job, that he didn't need a successor for sometime as the company would run on itself for sometime

So the bottomline is that Azim saved Rs.14 crores apart from incentives [which must have been quite a bit, so much so that Azim has enough stored up to hire a new guy !

Good management !
.

Thursday, March 27, 2008

Microsoft helps nab piracy ring

SEATTLE -

Microsoft is telling the tale of a major software piracy investigation that weaved through 22 countries, hoping would-be pirates will think twice if they know how far the company will go to protect its computer code worth billions in revenue each quarter.

Near-perfect knockoffs of 21 different Microsoft programs began surfacing around the world just over a decade ago. Soon, PCs in more than a dozen countries were running illegal copies of Windows and Office, turning unwitting consumers into criminals and, Microsoft says, exposing them to increased risk of malicious viruses and spyware.
The case began to turn in 2001 when U.S. Customs officers seized a shipping container in Los Angeles filled with $100 million in fake software, including 31,000 copies of the Windows operating system.

From there, Microsoft pushed the investigation through 22 countries. Local law enforcement officials seized software, equipment and records, and made arrests. A court in Taiwan handed down the last of the major sentences in December. Microsoft estimates the retail value of the software the operation generated at $900 million.

"That is a tremendous accomplishment," said James Spertus, a former federal prosecutor in Los Angeles who later led anti-piracy efforts for the Motion Picture Association of America. "There are only going to be a few cases like this a decade."

Now Microsoft is eager to talk about the experience because taking down that operation — responsible for about 90 percent of the fake software the company found between 1999 and 2004, more than 470,000 disks — didn't actually stop piracy. It just left room for more counterfeiters to rise. Microsoft hopes would-be pirates will think twice if they know how far it will go to protect the computer code worth billions in revenue each quarter.

The pirates mimicked complex holograms stamped directly onto disks and packaging materials embedded with the kind of tiny safety threads used in making money. In some cases, it took experts with microscopes to notice that disks printed with codes used by legitimate software factories lacked certain minuscule, unique smudges.

"The copies were so good, we went to tremendous forensic and scientific lengths to establish that the counterfeits were, in fact, counterfeits," said David Finn, an associate general counsel at Microsoft.

Without a solid lead on the source, Microsoft continued to gather string. Members of its 80-person worldwide anti-piracy team made test buys to see if retailers were selling fake disks, knowingly or unwittingly, and worked leads back up the black-market supply chain.

The seizure of the container in Los Angeles led to Taiwan, where the Ministry of Justice raided Chungtek Hightech, recovering an estimated $100 million more in software and equipment. Months later, Taipei city police and the criminal investigations branch of the national police hit Cinway Technology, a related manufacturer in the same industrial complex, seizing another $126 million in phony software. Records found there led to a packing, storage and shipping center in China's Guangdong province, and back to distributor Maximus Technology in Taiwan.

Finally, in 2007, the owner and operator of Chungtek and Cinway, Chen Bi-ching, was sentenced in Taiwan to four years in prison, while her two co-defendants received jail terms of three years and one year. And the distribution outfit's owner, Huang Jer-sheng, was sentenced to four years in prison. In China, the Public Security Bureau raided the packing and shipping company, Zhang Sheng Electronics, and Li Jian, the manager, was sentenced to three years in 2004.

Matching the Taiwanese counterfeits to copies found around the world, Microsoft gave law enforcement agencies ammunition for raids and criminal cases in the U.S., the U.K., Italy, Canada, Germany, Singapore, Australia, Paraguay and Poland. Dozens of big distributors, middlemen and retailers were convicted, including 35 people in the U.S.

One was Lisa Chen, who according to a Customs press release arrived at the scene of the 2001 shipping container bust with additional counterfeit software in her vehicle. Chen was prosecuted by the Los Angeles district attorney's office as a major U.S. distributor of the Taiwan fakes and received a nine-year prison term in November 2002. She
has since been released, according to her lawyer at the time.

Microsoft would not say how much it spent on the investigation or how many counterfeit copies of Windows, Office and other programs were found in use on consumer or business PCs.

Spertus, the former federal prosecutor, said the burden is often on the company holding the brand to travel the world collecting evidence, doing undercover work and coordinating with law enforcement agencies.

Few companies are willing to devote serious resources to anti-piracy enforcement, especially because the return is hard to prove. People who buy counterfeit software aren't likely to have paid retail prices anyway, Spertus said. But a big bust adds significant weight to lobbying efforts for stricter international intellectual property laws.

After the Taiwan raids, the number of high-end Microsoft counterfeits dropped — but only for a while. A Chinese operation that stepped in to meet the worldwide demand for cut-rate software cranked out an estimated $2 billion in copies before it was brought down in July after a six-year investigation by the FBI and China's Public Security Bureau.

Today, sophisticated copies of Windows Vista and other programs continue to appear. "I don't for a minute think that the final chapters have been written," Finn said